
A class in historical theology has me reading Gustavo GutiƩrrez and answering the question, "Do you agree that God has preferential treatment for the poor over the rich?" My response is to simultaneously disagree and agree.
I disagree in that I do not believe God has preferential treatment for any (individual or group) over any other. I maintain God's preference is for a love of all creation. God's love is such that there is no need for God to prefer one over another, but can hold all in complete and total love, and in that love hope for the preference of all.
However, you and I are not God. In our brokenness and for the sake of salvation (as individuals, as a people and as the whole of creation), we need to live with a preference for the poor. We can - and should - talk about what this preference looks like, how we translate this preference into action and lifestyle, and who (what) makes up "the poor," but not as an excuse to ignore injustice and those who are oppressed.
The fact that we are reading this (that we have access to a computer and the Internet) places us amongst the global "rich." Regardless of ethnicity, nationality, or faith, we can all find examples in our histories, recent or long ago, of injustices committed by our peoples. We can also find examples of injustices committed against us. And, even though we are by definition among the global rich, that does not exclude us from personally being victimized by unjust systems, oppressive regimes, or playground bullies.
A preferential option for the poor is not a dualism that names white-male-Americans "bad" and everyone else "good." It is a theology which hears the cries of those who suffer and prefers to enter into that suffering than to retreat into the euphoric haze of apathy.



